Re: [ga] Re: 2001-2002 Budget

[Eric Dierker]

Mr. Williams is right on point but does not go far enough to lay it out.

1.    You take the self serving language from staff saying they need more money.
        (found abundantly in the budget)
2.    You take no funding for the elections.
3.    You take no funding for a funding staff -i.e. grant writers, foundation
sponsorship writers.
4.    Threats of removing the Non-Coms voting.
5.    Failure to get qualified based upon performance from the IRS.
6.    You have a "leaked" report obviously to test the waters.
7.    you have no funding for the GA chairs.
8.    You threaten to cut off a list open to all in the GA after closing the
others.
9.    You can't find 1.3$ million worth of proof for your certified audit.
10.    You fund a redundant study  (at-Large)

You are in violation of the APA and several CFR's  and you are attempting to peddle
influence with public officials. Can anyone else spell RICO?  Watch the next move
is to go profit by default.

Sincerely,


Jeff Williams wrote:

> Vint and all assembly members,
>
> vint cerf wrote:
>
> > folks,
> >
> > this begs the question of the report from the at-large study which is
> > supposed to include consideration of funding among many other things.
>
>   Ok than why the secret board meeting and nix the election funds to
> a total of $-0- ?
>
> >
> >
> > It makes more sense to me for the board and finance committee to take this
> > matter up after we have recommendations from Carl Bildt's committee in
> > hand.
>
>   Well of course it does not that the budget has bee decided....  Please
> Vint, people here are not fools...  (Sarcasm intended)
>
> >
> >
> > vint
> >
> > At 07:33 AM 5/11/2001 -0500, Bruce James wrote:
> > >>>>I support Danny Younger's position. The least that the Board should
> > >do, is make some sort of provision in case there will be elections.
> > >Marc Schneiders<<<
> > >
> > >I agree also, this just another slap in our face. We should have a budget
> > >for Elections or the whole purpose of ICANN's *bottom up mission* is another
> > >falsehood.
> > >
> > >We really do care about ICANN, but we also demand that they follow their
> > >Mission!
> > >
> > >We, the people, DEMAND representation on the ICANN Board through Elections!
> > >
> > >/Bruce James/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >----- Original Message -----
> > >From: "Marc Schneiders" <marc@venster.nl>
> > >To: "Danny Younger" <webmaster@babybows.com>
> > >Cc: <ga@dnso.org>
> > >Sent: May 11, 2001 04:13
> > >Subject: Re: [ga] Re: 2001-2002 Budget
> > >
> > >
> > >On Fri, 11 May 2001, at 03:45 [=GMT-0400], Danny Younger wrote:
> > >
> > >> Would you rather get answers for the questions that affect us all before
> > >> this Budget is voted upon, or would you prefer that we debate this issue
> > >for
> > >> a few more weeks (following your definition of proper procedure) and allow
> > >> the Board to act on this matter without the benefit of our input?
> > >
> > >I support Danny Younger's position. The least that the Board should
> > >do, is make some sort of provision in case there will be elections.
> > >
> > >Marc Schneiders
> > >
> > >--
> > >This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> > >Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > >("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> > >Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> >
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Jeffrey A. Williams
> Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 118k members strong!)
> CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
> Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
> E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
> Contact Number:  972-447-1800 x1894 or 214-244-4827
> Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208