From: Esther Dyson
Subject: RE: [ALSC-Forum] Identifying interests
Date: Sat, 12 May 2001 13:59:19 -0700
Post a Message
[Date Prev]
[Date Next]
[Thread Prev]
[Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
not necessarily. It is just harder to figure out. When people say they are
speaking for their own interests, you can usually trust them - and their
description of their own interests.
When people say they are speaking for the *public* interest, it is harder
to believe. But that doesn't mean it's not worth trying to define it.
Esther Dyson
At 00:17 12.05.01 -0700, Bruce Young wrote:
>Reply to Riel Miller:
>
> >I thought it might be worth pointing, just briefly, that there is a fourth
> >"interest" that you don't quite capture - it is the common or public
> >interest that is more than just the sum of individual interests or company
> >interests.
>
>Agreed. But as I see it this is less a separate interest group and more
>the result of consensus formed through discussion and agreement by the three
>groups I mentioned.
>
>
>Bruce Young
>Portland, Oregon
>byoung651@home.com
>http://members.home.net/byoung651/index.html
Esther Dyson Always make new mistakes!
chairman, EDventure Holdings
writer, Release 3.0 (on Website below)
edyson@edventure.com
1 (212) 924-8800 -- fax 1 (212) 924-0240
104 Fifth Avenue (between 15th and 16th Streets; 20th floor)
New York, NY 10011 USA
http://www.edventure.com
High-Tech Forum in Europe: 7 to 9 November, Berlin
PC FORUM: 24 to 27 March 2002, Scottsdale (Phoenix), Arizona
[Date Prev]
[Date Next]
[Thread Prev]
[Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]