From: Kent Crispin
Subject: Re: [ALSC-Forum] Feedback on Draft Report
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 20:26:16 -0700

Post a Message
[Date Prev]   [Date Next]   [Thread Prev]   [Thread Next]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]


On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 10:37:17PM +0000, David Farrar wrote:
> 
> Capture and fraud are different matters.  I agree e-mail address by itself is 
> open to fraud.  However the necessity to also provide a workable postal address 
> takes care of almost all fraud issues assuming the elector database can detect 
> postal duplicate addresses.

I'm sorry, but you simply don't comprehend the problem.  Having mail
from the same postal address might be perfectly OK -- my wife lives with
me, after all.  But so does my canary, and my dog, and maybe 15
imaginary people.  All of them can have email addresses and legal postal
addresses.  A legal postal address is essentially no protection against
fraud. 


-- 
Kent Crispin                               "Be good, and you will be
kent@songbird.com                           lonesome." -- Mark Twain


[Date Prev]   [Date Next]   [Thread Prev]   [Thread Next]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]