From: Kent Crispin
Subject: Re: [ALSC-Forum] Feedback on Draft Report
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 20:26:16 -0700
Post a Message
[Date Prev]
[Date Next]
[Thread Prev]
[Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 10:37:17PM +0000, David Farrar wrote:
>
> Capture and fraud are different matters. I agree e-mail address by itself is
> open to fraud. However the necessity to also provide a workable postal address
> takes care of almost all fraud issues assuming the elector database can detect
> postal duplicate addresses.
I'm sorry, but you simply don't comprehend the problem. Having mail
from the same postal address might be perfectly OK -- my wife lives with
me, after all. But so does my canary, and my dog, and maybe 15
imaginary people. All of them can have email addresses and legal postal
addresses. A legal postal address is essentially no protection against
fraud.
--
Kent Crispin "Be good, and you will be
kent@songbird.com lonesome." -- Mark Twain
[Date Prev]
[Date Next]
[Thread Prev]
[Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]