RE: [ALSC-Forum] RE: Sims/EU development -- CALL TO ACTION/PLEDGE

[Judith Oppenheimer]

If there are inaccuracies in my reporting, please point them out to me.  If
you are right, the errors will be corrected immediately.

(That's a standing policy, not just related to this matter.  I am always
grateful for the heads-up.)

As for your opinion of my commentary, you're entitled.  You have faith in
the sincerity of certain people.  I can't imagine why - I've seen no
evidence to draw such a conclusion - only the opposite, and I've lost
patience with it - but you're entitled.   (I'd be happy to discuss this
privately if you wish - I'm truly curious why you feel as you do.)

Meanwhile, I would not and did not write this carelessly or thoughtlessly -
and I stand by it.

J

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
Judith Oppenheimer
http://JudithOppenheimer.com
http://ICBTollFreeNews.com
212 684-7210, 1 800 The Expert
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-forum@www.atlargestudy.org
> [mailto:owner-forum@www.atlargestudy.org]On Behalf Of Bret Fausett
> Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 8:46 PM
> To: forum@atlargestudy.org
> Subject: Re: [ALSC-Forum] RE: Sims/EU development -- CALL TO
> ACTION/PLEDGE
>
>
>
> Judith, this is unfair. You've woven together several
> unrelated events into
> a conspiracy picture that is simply not justified by the
> facts and, using
> the false story you wrote, impugned the motives of people who
> are sincerely
> trying to assist this effort. It's not helpful.
>
>          -- Bret
>
> Judith Oppenheimer wrote:
> > We all know that At Large was eviscerated and its leaders
> cut off from
> > their constituents, in part, by two of the people who now
> claim to want to
> > support it.
> >
> > At least one of them had knowledge of Joe Sims' secret
> meeting in Brussels
> > yesterday (see
> http://www.icbtollfree.com/article.cfm?articleId=5598), and
> > likely the other (see
> http://aspeninstitute.org/c&s/ipp.html), if not both,
> > were at yet another private meeting held today in D.C. that
> was debriefed
> > by Sims, and saw the construction of yet more ICANN
> reconstruction theories
> > (see http://www.lextext.com/onepagers.html), outside of the
> "open and
> > transparent" process.  Much in the same way that these same
> two players
> > participated in ICANN's original construction - behind closed doors.
> >
> > In fact, I fail to see any difference in Mr. Roberts' or
> Ms. Dyson's "open
> > and transparent" behavior now, than what we've experienced
> in the past.
> >
> > Their self-implication of leadership by way of their
> magnanimous "pledges"
> > to At Large, is the height of disingenuous pomposity.
> >
> > And I for one, am not amused.  (Though they seem to be
> having a good time.)
>
>
>