Re: [ALSC-Forum] RE: Sims/EU development -- CALL TO ACTION/PLEDGE

[Jeff Williams]

Judith and all stakeholders or interested parties,

  I did not read anything in your write up that was in any way
misleading as Brett seems to be contending.  I also ask Brett
to point out specifically and publicly any inaccuracies he contends
are there.  Brett, you have the floor on this thread now.

Judith Oppenheimer wrote:

> If there are inaccuracies in my reporting, please point them out to me.  If
> you are right, the errors will be corrected immediately.
>
> (That's a standing policy, not just related to this matter.  I am always
> grateful for the heads-up.)
>
> As for your opinion of my commentary, you're entitled.  You have faith in
> the sincerity of certain people.  I can't imagine why - I've seen no
> evidence to draw such a conclusion - only the opposite, and I've lost
> patience with it - but you're entitled.   (I'd be happy to discuss this
> privately if you wish - I'm truly curious why you feel as you do.)
>
> Meanwhile, I would not and did not write this carelessly or thoughtlessly -
> and I stand by it.
>
> J
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
> Judith Oppenheimer
> http://JudithOppenheimer.com
> http://ICBTollFreeNews.com
> 212 684-7210, 1 800 The Expert
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-forum@www.atlargestudy.org
> > [mailto:owner-forum@www.atlargestudy.org]On Behalf Of Bret Fausett
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 8:46 PM
> > To: forum@atlargestudy.org
> > Subject: Re: [ALSC-Forum] RE: Sims/EU development -- CALL TO
> > ACTION/PLEDGE
> >
> >
> >
> > Judith, this is unfair. You've woven together several
> > unrelated events into
> > a conspiracy picture that is simply not justified by the
> > facts and, using
> > the false story you wrote, impugned the motives of people who
> > are sincerely
> > trying to assist this effort. It's not helpful.
> >
> >          -- Bret
> >
> > Judith Oppenheimer wrote:
> > > We all know that At Large was eviscerated and its leaders
> > cut off from
> > > their constituents, in part, by two of the people who now
> > claim to want to
> > > support it.
> > >
> > > At least one of them had knowledge of Joe Sims' secret
> > meeting in Brussels
> > > yesterday (see
> > http://www.icbtollfree.com/article.cfm?articleId=5598), and
> > > likely the other (see
> > http://aspeninstitute.org/c&s/ipp.html), if not both,
> > > were at yet another private meeting held today in D.C. that
> > was debriefed
> > > by Sims, and saw the construction of yet more ICANN
> > reconstruction theories
> > > (see http://www.lextext.com/onepagers.html), outside of the
> > "open and
> > > transparent" process.  Much in the same way that these same
> > two players
> > > participated in ICANN's original construction - behind closed doors.
> > >
> > > In fact, I fail to see any difference in Mr. Roberts' or
> > Ms. Dyson's "open
> > > and transparent" behavior now, than what we've experienced
> > in the past.
> > >
> > > Their self-implication of leadership by way of their
> > magnanimous "pledges"
> > > to At Large, is the height of disingenuous pomposity.
> > >
> > > And I for one, am not amused.  (Though they seem to be
> > having a good time.)
> >
> >
> >

Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 121k members/stakeholdes strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number:  972-244-3801 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208