RE: [ALSC-Forum] Re: Bottom up process and group dynamics

[Judith Oppenheimer]

> the Board proceeded on the basis of the advice tendered.

That would be a first, wouldn't it.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
Judith Oppenheimer
http://JudithOppenheimer.com
http://ICBTollFreeNews.com
212 684-7210, 1 800 The Expert
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-forum@www.atlargestudy.org
> [mailto:owner-forum@www.atlargestudy.org]On Behalf Of
> DannyYounger@cs.com
> Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 3:50 PM
> To: forum@atlargestudy.org
> Subject: [ALSC-Forum] Re: Bottom up process and group dynamics
>
>
>
> Bill,
>
> Please feel free to ride your horse with blinders on.  When the ICANN
> Committee on Evolution and Reform reviews all the public
> comments submitted,
> and presents its final conclusions on a way forward to the
> ICANN Board, your
> group will have to live with the fact that it submitted no
> commentary, and
> that the Board proceeded on the basis of the advice tendered.
>  That could
> well mean no At-Large Membership, no At-Large Organization,
> and no At-Large
> Directors, because you and others couldn't be bothered to
> submit a plan for
> ICANN Reform that provided for At-Large representation.
>
> Go ahead and hold your elections... Play at
> parliamentarianism as much as you
> like... Instead of having nine At-Large Directors in ICANN,
> or six or five,
> you will likely have none, and your elected "leadership" will
> be nothing more
> than just another voice within what ICANN will term "an
> At-Large mechanism"
> that offers no seats on the Board to any of you...  You will
> become just
> another ISOC or ACM on the periphery without any real
> representation within
> the ICANN process.
>
> By failing to offer an alternative to the Lynn Plan or
> alternatives to global
> online elections, you are arrogantly sealing your own doom.
>
>
>