She is not on the board, got paid to work in the ALSC, is a leading banner carrier for ICANN, interfaces on a regular basis in a closed manners with the staff and BoD members. She works with and influences policy behind the scenes.
Yes she is not staff. So why do not you show a little sophistication and not bullshit the world with this kind of spin selling? Yes she is doing her own "managing process" which most of us would soon see go away, she has a history of collusion and ill formed not nice indications.
I am glad you now have branded yourself clearly as a supporter of her agenda. While I personally like you at least now it is clear you are opposed to AL seats on the board, and therefor I must consider you hostile to my dotcommoners
Sincerely,
Eric
"Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" wrote:
I note that Denise Michel is NOT ICANN staff.
Really, let's show a little sophistication, here. The average woman on the street can tell the difference between staff who are hired by ICANN and someone who is managing a process, with independent funding. It is a very hard task, by the way, that latter one..Show some recognition for that. I don't agree with your perspective AT ALL.Marilyn-----Original Message-----
From: William S. Lovell [mailto:wsl@cerebalaw.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 04, 2002 6:38 PM
To: James Love
Cc: Denise Michel ALSC; forum@atlargestudy.org
Subject: Re: [ALSC-Forum] ICANN Announcement - At-Large List Names Sought; ALSC Forum ...
James Love wrote:
071601c1f24a$2db51b70$0b00a8c0@essential.org" type="cite">That's the way I've interpreted it as well. The money Esther Dyson speaks of goesWhat do you and the rest of the ICANN staff mean by "at large structures." Is this the ICANN way of saying it will do the Lynn plan, where you don't recognize any single structure to formally represent the public, but you have these consultations with various groups, that have zero votes on anything? I note that the Lynn plan doesn't have much of a role for users or the public in general other than to have some PR staff person talk to them. Jamie
to ICANN, to be spent as it sees fit, and I've earlier characterized that Announcement
thing as "divide and conquer." It's typical ICANN chicanery.Bill Lovell
071601c1f24a$2db51b70$0b00a8c0@essential.org" type="cite">--------------------from the Lynn proposal------ 2. Manager of Public Participation a) Responsible for managing the public comment and participation process for ICANN on all substantive matters. Will solicit, receive and report to the Board on all public input on matters put out for public comment. b) Responsible for managing all ICANN public forums, public e-mail list, etc. Provided necessary electronic access to publicize findings and recommendations, all of which will be available to the public. c) Provided with support staff and other resources necessary to carry out responsibilities effectively ----- Original Message ----- From: "Denise Michel ALSC" <dmichel@atlargestudy.org> To: <forum@atlargestudy.org> Sent: Thursday, May 0 2, 2002 6:06 PM Subject: Re: [ALSC-Forum] ICANN Announcement - At-Large List Names Sought; ALSC Forum ...Ok. As someone who was just elected for a 90 day panel working on this, what do you mean by "facilitate the creation of At-Large structures."? Are there some services you are able to provide efforts such as the onethatI got roped into? JamieWhat services is icannatlarge.com looking for? Currently, I'm doing outreach to identify individuals/groups worldwide interested in organizing At-Large structures, looking for commonobjectivesand interests relevant to Internet users and ICANN's mission, and establishing mechanisms for coordination and cooperation among (current/future) at-large structures. Denise Denise Michel dmichel@atlargestudy.org