Re: [atlarge-discuss] Re: [ALSC-Forum] ICANN Announcement - At-LargeList Nam...

[eric]

It is here where I see the best chance of success.

I support a rebidding process because I do not believe changes will
occur
without the outside influence.

The BoD remains silent except for Alejandro and Karl.  They I think
would like
change.

Where as the rest do not care one bit about internet users.

Sincerely,
Eric

Karl Auerbach wrote:

> On Sun, 5 May 2002 DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:
>
> > 3.) Do you or do you not support that any At-Large will elect at least
> >       51% or 9 board seats?
>
> There are currently *19* board seats, not 18.  So 51% means at least *10*
> not 9.  Of course, after the "evolution" all bets are off. ;-)
>
> The easiest way to fix this, of course, is to eliminate the ex-officio
> board seat given to ICANN's president.  (This was part of my "platform"
> when I ran in the board election so many moons ago:
>         http://www.cavebear.com/icann-board/platform.htm#no-ceo-on-board )
>
>                 --karl--