Re: [ALSC-Forum] icannatlarge.com security issue

[William S. Lovell]

Bruce:

Ah! Something I can respond to! (I've used up my 5-post limit on ga@dnso.org.)

Anyway, you never know what to expect from Danny. He is now speaking of there
being
"No At-Large and No GA." With his attacks on icannatlarge.com, he also advocates
"no
icannatlarge.com." In other words, anarchy. ???

I've been babbling with Ross Rader, who has advocated not taking the time
to expand
#1 with whereas clauses, preambles, and the like, this (May 10) being the
deadline.  I
told him I had no problem with that, since we can always have a more detailed
#2,
whatever happens to #1. (I should be listed as a supporter of #1, by the
way -- not 
that it makes much difference.)  Question is, though, should we do a #2 in
ga@dnso.org,
in icannatlarge.com, or both?

Bill Lovell

Bruce Young wrote:
> GMEHJOBGDHBJAFJNENBNEENLCEAA.Bruce@barelyadequate.info">
> Joanna Lane wrote:
>
> > I am shocked that anybody but a paid saboteur would want to make such a
> > viperous attack on this democratically run grass roots movement that has
> >     
> the
> > best of intentions.
> >       
>
> I have no evidence of payment, but Danny has obviously joined the Dark Side.
> At this point I have to unfortunately trat anything he posts as suspect.
> Sad.  I always considered him a fellow traveler.
>
> > . . . there is no question in my mind that the Steering Committee is
> > holding the new organization to higher standards than the ICANN Board
> > would have it do with respect to the public trust, something they have
> > consistently betrayed.
> >         
>
> I share both sentiments.  We need to steer the steady course we started on,
> and use ICANN's fall from grace as a negative role model.
>
> Bruce Young
> Portland, Oregon
> Bruce@barelyadequate.info
> http://www.barelyadequate.info
> --------------------------------------------
> Support democratic control of the Internet!
> Go to http://www.icannatlarge.com and Join ICANN At Large!
>
>
>
>